Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Could This Act Make A Comeback...?
I found a little bit of history that I'll admit I was totally ignorant about! Guess I'm not as smart as I thought!
The really bad thing? It was signed into law by a man that I thought was such a good example of someone who was "for the people"!
See what you think...!
John Adams: The nation's second president has been getting a well-deserved reappraisal, thanks to David McCullough's magisterial biography. But Adams' signing of the Alien and Sedition acts during the threat of war -- effectively outlawing anti-government dissent and curtailing freedom of speech and freedom of the press -- was a radically anti-democratic action and a black mark on this Founding Father's otherwise honorable service to our nation.
There were actually four separate laws making up what is commonly referred to as the "Alien and Sedition Acts"
1. The Naturalization Act (officially An Act to Establish a Uniform Rule of Naturalization; ch. 54, 1 Stat. 566) extended the duration of residence required for aliens to become citizens to 14 years. Enacted June 18, 1798, with no expiration date, it was repealed in 1802.
2. The Alien Friends Act (officially An Act Concerning Aliens; ch. 58, 1 Stat. 570) authorized the president to deport any resident alien considered "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States." It was activated June 25, 1798, with a two year expiration date.
3. The Alien Enemies Act (officially An Act Respecting Alien Enemies; ch. 66, 1 Stat. 577) authorized the president to apprehend and deport resident aliens if their home countries were at war with the United States of America. Enacted July 6, 1798, and providing no sunset provision, the act remains intact today as 50 U.S.C. § 21–24. At the time, war was considered likely between the U.S. and France.
4. The Sedition Act (officially An Act for the Punishment of Certain Crimes against the United States; ch. 74, 1 Stat. 596) made it a crime to publish "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" against the government or its officials. It was enacted July 14, 1798, with an expiration date of March 3, 1801 (the day before Adams' presidential term was to end).
This whole thing is very disturbing to me, and I don't kid myself about the possibility of some of the folks in power trying to bring it back in some fashion.
Thomas Jefferson even voiced his opinion about the constitutionality of this act!
While Jefferson did denounce the Sedition Act as invalid and a violation of the First Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, which protected the right of free speech, his main argument on its unconstitutionality was that it violated the Tenth Amendment:[citation needed] "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Jefferson more strongly argued the Federal Government had overstepped its limits in the Alien and Sedition Acts by attempting to exercise unjust powers
I'm sorry to say that I don't believe all of the folks in power would hesitate to use this, if it were reinstated. And we could be even closer than we think to another version of this act becoming law!
I hate it when I find out about something like this, but because I was not wise enough to find it on my own!
C'mon...let's get some fresh coffee and sit outside for a bit. I can really use it today!
I don't think we'll get a new set of Alien & Sedition Acts, but what's in place now is far worse in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteNowadays, they just use the media to crucify anyone with the guts to speak out. Clinton did it, Bush W. did it, and Obama does it too. It goes back quite a bit further than that actually, but that's where it really became the normal practice.
Using the media is cheaper, subtler, and usually more effective.
Hey Ranger...
ReplyDeleteThe media never has such fun as when they can join in with the crucifying of someone...be it true or not.
Funny how the retractions, when printed, are always smaller print than the stories...or come at the end of a broadcast!
What ever slls, it seems!
Thanks for coming by!
I wonder about a government that feels the need to silence dissent rather than face it and/or disprove it. What are people so afraid of, that they wish to gag those who speak out? That truth may come to light?
ReplyDeleteFeh.
I don't know that it would happen again in such an open fashion, but I do wonder if there isn't something burried in, say, the Patriot Act that would alow such liberties to be taken with our freedoms.
Shade and Sweetwater,
K
I think Uncle Sugar will use any means to take control over the sheeple including old ideas. With all the change coming about I can hardly drink coffe anymore, I reach for the anti-acids.
ReplyDeleteHey K...
ReplyDeleteThe very fact that so many of these bills are passed without anyone reading them leaves no doubt in my mind that there are things hidden that they don'tn want us to know about.
Sad, but true!
Thanks for coming by today!
Hey Mechanic...
I do indeed know what you mean, my friend. Gets a little worse each day!
All I can say is...I hope folks go out and vote come November to send a message!
Thanks for coming by today!
We just can't let anybody ruin a good cup of coffee!!
ReplyDeleteThey don't need it. Thanks to BushCo and now Obammy, all the President has to do is point a finger at you and they just kill you outright.
ReplyDeleteBastards.
Hey LiBeth...
ReplyDeleteBoy, I'll go along with you on that! Don't mess with my coffee...bad move!
Hey, appreciate the visit today!
Hey Busted...
I'm thinking you are right about that...and it's probably happened more times than we really want to know!
These guys have no hesitation to do what they want!
I appreciate you coming by today!
They're working up to it Jim. "Creeping Incrementalism"....
ReplyDeleteHey Mayberry...
ReplyDeleteSlowly is probably the safest way for them to try!
I can only imagine what folks now days would say once they caught wind of this!
Thanks for dropping in, my friend!