Saturday, August 9, 2014

Say Again, Mr. Ford...!

At the very best of times, many of us can be made to appear less than savvy about certain things...like history. However, for some this has caused a lot of embarrassment!

While there is a very old saying that says "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt", or words to that effect. Having money doesn't always mean a lack of ignorance, but in some cases it might give the impression of being somewhat of an airhead! This could be really bad for your public image, especially in a courtroom.


How To Prove Henry Ford Was Dumb (In Court)

By Dustin Koski on Friday, August 8, 2014


Henry_ford_1919


Henry Ford once sued the Chicago Tribune for slander because it called him an ignorant anarchist. In court, the defense attorney decided to demonstrate Ford’s ignorance and lack of patriotism by asking him basic American history questions. The automobile tycoon consistently missed these questions, and court transcripts of his buffoonery became popular reading at the time. Ultimately, the court ruled in Ford’s favor and awarded him six cents.

Henry Ford is best remembered for his Model T as the vehicle that popularized automobiles across all social classes in America, his extreme implementation of the assembly line (which wasn’t actually his invention) and for being so anti-semitic that Adolf Hitler complimented him in Mein Kampf. But in 1919, he got into a mess that briefly made him a laughingstock—and he had no one to blame but himself.

In a 1916 article, the Chicago Tribune printed a long string of insults, calling Ford “an anarchist,” “an ignorant idealist,” and “incapable of thought” after he protested military mobilization along the Mexican border. Ford sued the newspaper for $1 million. Proceedings began three years later. It would ultimately stretch out for 14 weeks and involve more than two million words of testimony.

At one point, Ford took the stand as the advocate for the Tribune prepared to demonstrate how well deserved the label “ignorant” was. The tycoon was asked a series of basic questions related to American history and his own political activeness. Ford’s wrong answers included believing that the Revolutionary War happened in 1812 and that Benedict Arnold was a writer. Ford was also quickly called on lying when asked about the only year that he voted. (That one wasn’t difficult to verify, since the supposed candidate was long dead by the time the supposed vote was cast.)

With one of the richest and most famous men in America being made to look like he belonged in a comedy show, court transcripts of his testimony began to hit the streets and become popular reading. Supposedly, one wily sales person in the vicinity of the courthouse made enough money selling them that he bought a house with the profits. Ford’s lawsuit (remember, he initiated the fight) was essentially legitimizing attacks that were three years old and no doubt long out of the public consciousness by then.

Ultimately, after hundreds of witnesses testified for both sides, a verdict was laid down in Ford’s favor. For all his time, energy, and humiliation, total costs for the trial had reached $1 million. The court awarded him six cents in damages. Modern readers might be tempted to scoff at such an award, but bear in mind that after adjusting for inflation it would equal 83 cents.

Twenty-two years after the trial, Tribune editor Colonel Robert McCormick wrote Ford an apology for the whole affair. He apparently took it in good spirits, for during a visit to Chicago, the Colonel was invited to meet with Ford in his private railcar. On a less personal note, historians have since reported that while Ford might have looked quite silly during his trial, public opinion shifted to his favor as a result of it. Not knowing too much about history apparently made the millionaire a more relatable figure.

I don't know that I could have answered any of the questions any better than Ford, but I'm pretty sure I couldn't have done much worse. Thanks to the folks over at KnowledgeNuts for making this bit of history available.

Coffee out on the patio this morning. Fresh, juicy peaches are available, if you want!

6 comments:

  1. We're all smart in our own way, I suppose. If he was so stupid, I don't think he'd have gotten where he was.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I learn a lot here Mr. Hermit, thanks! Nothing beats fresh peaches - be right there!

    ReplyDelete
  3. When is the last time the nation has had a court case that was so entertaining?

    Coffee on the deck will have to wait until the fog burns off.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know the paper made a big mistake in this case. I'm sure they had to eat humble pie in the end even if it doesn't tell you that. New's papers live to gossip.

    Very humid here again not even a breeze.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sounds like Mr. Ford was more lucky than smart if this is an indication of his intelligence .....live fresh peaches :))

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess if you are rich enough you don't need to be too smart, especially in the field of history.

    ReplyDelete